Is this one of the reasons why Obama hides his past? Re: Obama: Trayvon Martin could have been me 35 years ago, Washington Examiner, July 20, 2013

The mainstream media in the United States is forcefeeding the American public a false picture of Trayvon Martin and the public is falling for it, has fallen for it.

It is, in effect, hiding his past, keeping his past from the public.

Trayvon Martin was no saint.

He was a punk, a thug, a thief and a drug dealer who had been in trouble with the law on many occasions and who was well known to police for his anti-social, criminal behavior.

When Obama said that Martin could have been him 35 years ago does he actually mean that when he was Martin’s age he was a punk, a thug, a thief and a drug dealer too?

Obama has always been notoriously closemouthed about his past and has really revealed very little about himself to the American public. Much of what he has revealed has been called into question and proven to be false, but that as they say is another story…the fact is Obama has kept the American public in the dark about a great deal of his past and he has done so with the complicity and cooperation of the mainstream media, which has given him an absolutely free ride just like it is doing with Martin.

Was Obama a punk, a thug, a thief and a drug dealer when he was Martin’s age?

Maybe.

Was he well known to police for anti-social, criminal behavior?

Maybe.

Don’t expect the mainstream media to tell you if he was though.

In fact, don’t expect the mainstream media to tell you anything about his past that would embarrass or politically compromise him or that would disqualify him from office, of which there is a great deal on all counts.

That would prove Obama’s narrative false and expose him for the charlatan (and liar and socialist and anti-American ideologue etc. etc.) he is.

Don’t expect the mainstream media to expose Martin either.

That would prove his narrative false too.

Comments are closed.